View our latest and past news items.
- Details
- Published:
Carbon Monoxide in Piston Engine Aircraft |
In February 2024 the UK Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) launched a 4-week public consultation on carbon monoxide (CO) in piston engine aircraft, seeking stakeholder views on the barriers facing pilots in obtaining an active CO detector, the role that maintenance plays in combatting CO, the importance of protecting passengers from CO, and whether active CO detectors ought to be mandatory for some operations.
The CAA has now published the Comment Response Document for this consultation, which includes a summary of the responses received, the decisions made, as well as the next steps being taken.
The CAA will be issuing a Safety Directive requiring an active CO detector to be present in specified piston engine aircraft when operating with passengers on board who do not possess a recognised pilot qualification. The directive will be published later this month and will come into effect from 1 January 2025.
These are the three decisions that the CAA have made:
CAA Decision 1
The CAA will introduce a requirement to have a functioning active carbon monoxide detector, capable of alerting via aural and/or visual means, in specified piston engine aircraft when operating with passengers on board who do not possess a recognised pilot
qualification. The comments provided in this consultation will be taken into account when developing the requirement.
CAA Decision 2
The CAA will not, at this time, introduce mandatory CO concentration checks in piston engine aircraft maintenance programmes beyond what is already specified by aircraft manufacturers and UK Reg (EU) No.1321/2014 Annex Vb (Part-ML), Minimum Inspection Programme (MIP).
CAA Decision 3
The CAA will publish additional guidance on topics including: selecting an appropriate active CO detector, where and how to securely position devices in aircraft, how to respond to alerts, as well as guidance on exposure levels and thresholds for alarms.
- Details
- Published:
Radiotelephony Manual (CAP 413) Edition 24 - Effective from 28 March 2024 |
Radiotelephony Manual (CAP 413) Edition 24 is now published. This future edition incorporates editorial changes and all Supplementary Instructions to December 2023. It is effective 28 March 2024.
Radiotelephony Manual (CAP 413) provides pilots, Air Traffic Services and ground personnel with a compendium of clear, standardised phraseology and guidance, for radiotelephony (RTF) communication in UK airspace.
NOTE:
CAP 413 Edition 24 was found to contain errors and has been withdrawn by the CAA. CAP 413 Edition 23 Corr is current at the date of this item.
- Details
- Published:
Charles Strasser OBE 1927 - 2024 |
Charles Strasser OBE SBStJ MSc FCIM
1927 - 2024
AOPA are sad to hear of the passing of Charles Strasser, vice-president of AOPA UK on 10 June 2024.
Charles's aviation related activities included, being Chairman of the Channel Island region of AOPA UK, a member of and past Vice Chairman of the Jersey Aero Club, a Director of and past world President of IFFR (International Fellowship of Flying Rotarians), a member of the PPL/IR Network and a past St John Ambulance Air Wing volunteer pilot and Midland region coordinator for the transportation of human kidneys for transplant.
He personally initiated and progressed on behalf of AOPAbringing into being the CAA CAP 667 9.2(c) recommendation that, to reduce the incidence of fatal GA accidents, airports and aeroedromes should not charge any fees for emergency and precautionary diversion landings - the Strasser Scheme.
Charles was born in Czechoslavakia but moved to the U.K. with his parents in 1938, aged 11. By the age of 18, he was a dispatch rider with the Czech Independent Armoured Brigade and led a convoy of allied troops into Kasejovice. He was made an honorary Czech citizen in 2021.
He became a successful businessman on his return to the U.K. and was actively involved in many charities. Charles was the regional coordinator for the Midlands St John Ambulance Air Wing. He was awarded an O.B.E. for humanitarian services in 2000.
An active pilot for many years, his Piper Seneca was a well known visitor to many airports and airfield throughout Europe and beyond. He held an FAA CPL and IR.
Charles made a significant contribution to general aviation and pilots will benefit for many years to come from his efforts to get a better deal for GA pilots. Charles was a tough but fair negotiator, not easily accepting bureaucracy and red tape.
AOPA has lost a member and the aviation community in general has lost much more.
- Details
- Published:
IAOPA News Report - VFR Flight Plans within Schengen Area |
In a previous newsletter it was reported that there has been a relaxation of the requirement to file a flightplan within the Schengen Area. This gave rise to several questions from our members, so a few clarifications are appropriate.
No flight plan is required for VFR flights to or from a state within the Schengen area unless:
- The relevant state has a flight plan requirement for VFR flights;
- The flight crosses the airspace of a state outside the Schengen area; or
- The submission of a flight plan is mandatory under paragraph SERA.4001, part b, subparts 1, 3, 4 and 6 of Regulation (EU) No. 923/2012.
SERA.4001 Submission of a flight plan states:
(a) Information relative to an intended flight or portion of a flight, to be provided to air traffic services units, shall be in the form of a flight plan. The term ‘flight plan’ is used to mean variously, full information on all items comprised in the flight plan description, covering the whole route of a flight, or limited information required, inter alia, when the purpose is to obtain a clearance for a minor portion of a flight such as to cross an airway, to take off from, or to land at a controlled aerodrome.
(b) A flight plan shall be submitted prior to operating:
(1) any flight or portion thereof to be provided with air traffic control service;
(2) any IFR flight within advisory airspace;
(3) any flight within or into areas, or along routes designated by the competent authority, to facilitate the provision of flight information, alerting and search and rescue services;
(4) any flight within or into areas or along routes designated by the competent authority, to facilitate coordination with appropriate military units or with air traffic services units in adjacent States in order to avoid the possible need for interception for the purpose of identification;
(5) any flight across international borders, unless otherwise prescribed by the States concerned;
(6) any flight planned to operate at night, if leaving the vicinity of an aerodrome.
(c) A flight plan shall be submitted, before departure, to an air traffic services reporting office or, during flight, transmitted to the appropriate air traffic services unit or air-ground control radio station, unless arrangements have been made for submission of repetitive flight plans.
(d) A flight plan for any flight planned to operate across international borders or to be provided with air traffic control service or air traffic advisory service shall be submitted at least sixty minutes before departure, or, if submitted during flight, at a time which will ensure its receipt by the appropriate air traffic services unit at least ten minutes before the aircraft is estimated to reach:
(1) the intended point of entry into a control area or advisory area; or
(2) the point of crossing an airway or advisory route.
This last point deserves some clarification. You must therefore submit a flight plan for:
Any flight or portion thereof to be provided with air traffic control service;
Any flight within or into areas, or along routes designated by the competent authority, to facilitate the provision of flight information, alerting and search and rescue services;
Any flight within or into areas or along routes designated by the competent authority, to facilitate coordination with appropriate military units or with air traffic services units in adjacent States in order to avoid the possible need for interception for the purpose of identification;
Any flight planned to operate at night, if leaving the vicinity of an aerodrome.
Please note that many countries still explicitly require a flightplan when crossing the border. Always check the AIP. AOPA Holland has prepared a document which gives the current status. In practice the following block of countries all have relaxations in the flight plan filing requirement: Netherlands, Belgium, Luxemburg, Germany, Austria, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania and Hungary
Also note that other Schengen countries not only require a flightplan when crossing the border but also still officially require you to land at a designated airport of entry even for intra-Schengen flights. For instance Denmark.
Schengen countries are Estonia, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Hungary, Malta, the Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Slovakia, Finland and Sweden, as well as the Balearic Islands, the Canary Islands, Madeira and the Azores. |
- Details
- Published:
Reclassify general aviation airfields as greenfield not brownfield sites: Government Response |
As the number of signatures has reached over 10,000 the Government published this response on 16 May 2024:
"We are not seeking to alter airfield classification at this current time.
The Government recognises the importance of the General Aviation (GA) industry for supporting key services as well as training and commercial use.
Critical to GA’s success is the network of airfields which reflect the diversity in the sector, differing in size and infrastructure capability, ranging from smaller airfields focused on training and educational opportunities, to larger regional and international business aviation hubs. They all have an important role in supporting the aviation sector.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) emphasises that planning policies should recognise the importance of maintaining a national network of GA airfields and their need to adapt and change over time. The NPPF is a material consideration in planning decisions, and each application is judged on its individual merits. It is for local planning authorities to make individual decisions based on the planning policy and guidance that reflect the local context and engagement with local stakeholders. The weight given to these considerations is a matter for the authority as the decision taker in the first instance.
The NPPF encourages effective use of land in meeting development needs, while safeguarding and improving the environment and ensuring safe and healthy living conditions. The NPPF states this should be in a way that makes as much use as possible of brownfield land.
Brownfield land is defined in the NPPF as “land which is or was occupied by a permanent structure, including the curtilage of the developed land (although it should not be assumed that the whole of the curtilage should be developed) and any associated fixed surface infrastructure”, with some specific exclusions.
Airfield buildings and their curtilage are currently regarded as brownfield land. However, as the policy above makes clear, it should not be assumed that the whole of the curtilage of a brownfield site should be developed.
Applications for planning permission to redevelop airfields must be determined in accordance with the development plan for the area unless material considerations indicate otherwise.
Applications for the reuse or redevelopment of airfields must also be considered in the context of wider national policy and account should be taken of the Government’s General Aviation Strategy. The NPPF acknowledges the significant contribution aviation makes to economic growth across the country – expecting planning policies, where supported by robust evidence, to identify and protect sites which could be critical in developing infrastructure to widen transport choice.
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities"
You can view the response online here.
If the number of signatories reaches, or exceeds, 100,000 the Petitions Committee will consider it for a debate.
- Details
- Published:
New Safety Sense Leaflet: VFR into IMC |
A new Safety Sense Leaflet has been published providing guidance to general aviation pilots on the risks and mitigations associated with continued Visual Flight Rules (VFR) flight into Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC).
This forms part of the popular Safety Sense series which are currently updating.
- Details
- Published:
General Aviation Pilot Licensing Review Phase 2: Aeroplanes - Consultation Closes 22 May 2024
|
In October 2022, the CAA published CAP2335 (General Aviation Pilot Licensing & Training Simplification – Phase 1: Strategic Direction) as part of a 3 Phase program to simplify training and licensing for the UK’s General Aviation (GA) Sector.
The subsequent GA community response (CAP2532) showed strong support in several key areas for updating our current legislation with regards to Licensing and Training.
AOPA has been fully engaged with the process and made significant contributions to the proposals and community response.
This consultation (Phase 2) will explore these key areas in more detail, to ensure that the CAA are working towards the goals of the community whilst maintaining legislative compliance within these areas. The consultaion closes on 22 May 2024.
The outcome of this consultation will help finalise the proposals for the simplification of licensing and training. The final proposals and legal drafting will be developed with the Department for Transport and presented for legislative amendment Spring 2025.
- Details
- Published:
HIAL Airport 2024 Parking Charges reduced for light aircraft |
When HIAL first published their charges for 2024, AOPA contacted HIAL to raise a number of concerns about the significant increase in costs for private GA flights in light aircraft, in particular parking fees. AOPA asked for these to be reviewed and HIAL have now revised charges for aircraft up to 2.5 tonnes:
Full details of HIAL terms and conditions can be found here.
- Details
- Published:
Online GAR Response Messages - Common Travel Area |
When travelling within the Common Travel Area (CTA) of UK & Northern Ireland, Channel Islands, Isle of Man and Ireland no Response Message will be displayed. This was not obvious to users of the service and in response to a query from AOPA the UPT Queries Team have advised that the guidance notes have been updated as below:
- Details
- Published:
HIAL Airport Charges Increase from 1 April 2024 |
Highland and Islands Airport Ltd (HIAL) have published charges for the use of their airports with effect from 1 April 2024. Details can be found here.
For private GA flights in light aircraft the charges have increased over 300% compared to 2023 charges. The significant changes have been the introduction of a navigation fee of £15 (+VAT) for aircraft under 2,500 kg and parking fees, the first 60 minutes are free and then charges of £40 (exc VAT) for the next 4 hours and then £2.50 (exc VAT) per hour, or part thereof, thereafter for aircraft up to 10,000 kg. An 8 hour stay for a private flight in an aircarft under 2,500 kg the basic cost will be:
Landing Fee: £21 +VAT
Navigation Fee: £15 + VAT
Parking: 60 minutes free, £40 + VAT for the next 4 Hours and £2.50 + VAT for the next 3 hours
Total: £100.20 inc VAT (The cost in 2023 would have been £31.18 inc VAT)
Other services would be additionally charged for if used.
When the 2024 charges were published, AOPA contacted HIAL with a number of questions in order to establish what charges would apply to private flights and some further clarifications. We have today received a response from Alastair Gleave, HIAL Chief Commercial Office. The salient points from his response are:
1) For clarification cost sharing flights meet the deifintion of a private flight. HIAL will review their wording.
2) The navigation fee covers all aspects of air navigation service provision, including Communication, Navigation, Surveillance (CNS), Meteorological (MET) and Air Traffic Services (ATS) – both Air Traffic Control (ATC) and Aerodrome Flight Information Service (AFIS), as applicable. Therefore, the navigation fee for air navigation services will apply to both IFR and VFR operations.
AOPA: Many of the services listed are not required by private pilots who self-handle and this charge will be challenged.
3) The review of HIAL’s Conditions of Use and charges identified aircraft parking as an area that required re-assessment. The published parking fees apply for all aircraft. The feedback received has highlighted the unintended impact of the new pricing scales on the private light aircraft community. The inclusion of an additional parking scale for aircraft up to 2.5 tonnes will be explored.
AOPA: It has been pointed out to HIAL that Dundee offer a 24 hour flat fee of £15 (+VAT) per day for light aircraft parking on grass. A similar flat fee should be considered for other HIAL airports.
Martin Robinson
CEO AOPA UK
- Details
- Published:
ACP-2023-033 London Oxford Airport Airspace Change Proposal Stakeholder Engagement: CAP 1616 DESIGN PRINCIPLES |
Oxford Aviation Services Limited (OASL), the operator of London Oxford Airport proposes to modernise its air navigation procedures and associated infrastructure. To progress this, they are required to commence a formal Airspace Change Proposal (ACP) process which is regulated and overseen by the United Kingdom (UK) Civil Aviation Authority (CAA).
In support of this stakeholed engagament, the following documents have been published:
To download either document click on the three dots.
Reponses regarding the draft Design Principles must be received by 24 April 2024. If you wish to provide AOPA with your views: